the cask of amontillado argument The cask of amontillado by edgar allen poe  provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the argument presented ws 104.
{"Image DocumentName": "Example: Irony in Poe\u2019s The Cask of Amontillado", "Image ImageDescription": "Several critics have pointed to Montresor s irrational behavior just before he walls in Fortunato, to the ambiguity of the Montresor coat of arms, and to indications that the narrator suffers from a guilty conscience, to support their contention that Montresor does not satisfy the criteria for the perfect act of revenge that he enumerates at the start of Edgar Allan Poe s The Cask of Amontillado . Building on those arguments. I would like to suggest that Fortunato literally and figuratively gets the last laugh in the tale because he knows what lies ahead for Montresor and himself in the next world. Significantly, Fortunato is the one who first alludes to what J. Gerald Kennedy calls Montresor s \u2018theological\u2019 guilt when he calls out, \u2018For the love of God, Montresor,\u2019 shortly before he is entombed (Gruesser 1). Source: Poe\u2019s Cask of Amontillado by John Gruesser.", "Image XResolution": "37", "Image YResolution": "37", "Image ResolutionUnit": "Pixels/Centimeter", "Image Software": "SlidePlayer", "Image YCbCrPositioning": "Centered"}