6 Development areas There is a significant lag effect, with only 60% of possible total population having done mid-year or full-year reviews Improvement in communication as a result of OSCR (40% agree, 30% disagree) leaves significant room for further improvement For research staff, the process of regular quarterly review meetings is not yet well established – only 26% agree and 55% disagree that the process is working effectively Reviewers feel that the OSCR process has helped to some degree to improve focus on objectives and development needs, but there is still significant improvement potential.
{}