Project – Toothpaste Tube Evaluation
{"Image DocumentName": "Project \u2013 Toothpaste Tube Evaluation", "Image ImageDescription": "The aluminum tube has a carbon footprint 3.7 times higher than the PBL tube. Adding the contribution of the other secondary packaging (unit cases, master box, wrapping film) and including the transport and the final disposal phase, this ratio is lowered to 1.6 times. Despite the long distance, the impact of transport of the PBL laminate from Mumbay to Virginia by ocean freighter is very low (0.95%, not indicated in the previous table). Considering 1 functional unit (a pack necessary to protect and deliver 100g of useful toothpaste), the switch from aluminum to plastic laminate lowers the carbon footprint of 38%. CFP index % / 100g toothpaste. Old tube. New tube. New tube, no case. total toothpaste packaging distribution", "Image XResolution": "37", "Image YResolution": "37", "Image ResolutionUnit": "Pixels/Centimeter", "Image Software": "SlidePlayer", "Image YCbCrPositioning": "Centered"}