Differentiators PACs/RIS combinations; What differentiates your integration schema from what you do with other RIS systems or other PACS systems
{"Image DocumentName": "DifferentiatorsPACs/RIS combinations; What differentiates your integration schema from what you do with other RIS systems or other PACS systems?", "Image ImageDescription": "By and large PACS and RIS combinations be it strategic or in-house developed seem to be better integrated because they have an incentive to offer tight integration beyond HL7. Therefore they share DB mapping and the integrations appear more complete and sometimes are just as unstable as a third party if the work is not QC validated! Few vendors will explore desktop integration with third party (disparate) systems except for the rare effort by IDX\u2019s (via its Imaging Suite) integrations with the major PACS vendor (offered via IFID documents created due to demand of IDX clients) the only real differentiator with its RIS centric approach towards integration is sharing a single DB with its strategic partner Stentor. 3rd parties as well as Stentor have to use Imaging Suite! Stand alone RIS systems that do not have a strategic relationship with a PACS vendor are more than willing to use a third party conduit, or self developed integration tools to integrate and bring better quality data to the PACS solution investment made by its clients. CCA. VitalWorks. Ximis. Merge. SoftMedical. Vendors willing to customize integrations if necessary to meet the needs of clients. More Reading Material.", "Image XResolution": "37", "Image YResolution": "37", "Image ResolutionUnit": "Pixels/Centimeter", "Image Software": "SlidePlayer", "Image YCbCrPositioning": "Centered"}