This example would not fall into any of Novak's original categories!
{"Image DocumentName": "This example would not fall into any of Novak\u2019s original categories!", "Image ImageDescription": "But! Both maps are rich and represent a cohesive vision of personal development but this is an example of the map that visually \u2018shrunk\u2019, has less links and is more of a \u2018story\u2019. His first map is a spoke, but a much richer spoke than any of other students\u2019, with rich linkage (multidirectional as well). His second map can be difficult to qualify as he did not follow the rules of concept mapping and went beyond, trying to represent his vision of personal development in a form of a journey from point A to B, with possible diversions, loops, factors and goals. However, the richness of the concepts and their interconnections would probably fit the definition of a net (hence meaningful learning). Both maps are much more developed in comparison to his peers and confirm reflexivity of the author. Although, at the first glance, his second map may look as a less developed (with less concepts as well) in fact it is a more deeply thought through one. The concepts from the first map were incorporated into a cohesive vision represented in the second map as if the author made more sense of them (personalised the concepts acquired in the course of studying and working). The second map also reflects the steps this student took on his personal development journey.", "Image XResolution": "37", "Image YResolution": "37", "Image ResolutionUnit": "Pixels/Centimeter", "Image Software": "SlidePlayer", "Image YCbCrPositioning": "Centered"}