Explanation, cont. Landmark court cases: Barron v. Baltimore: The Bill of Rights is not applicable to the states. Gitlow v. New York: The Supreme Cour
{"Image DocumentName": "Explanation, cont. Landmark court cases:", "Image ImageDescription": "Barron v. Baltimore: The Bill of Rights is not applicable to the states. Gitlow v. New York: The Supreme Court decided that parts of the Bill of Rights are applicable to state governments. Since they are fundamental rights and liberties, freedom of the press and speech are protected from infringement by states in the due process clause. Palko v. Connecticut: A standard to selective interpretation was established, as any right considered fundamental and essential to the concept of liberty was to be applied to the states. Miranda v. Arizona: The due process clause was applied to defendants, and their rights expanded and protected from the states.", "Image XResolution": "37", "Image YResolution": "37", "Image ResolutionUnit": "Pixels/Centimeter", "Image Software": "SlidePlayer", "Image YCbCrPositioning": "Centered"}