Comparison of TriPollar® to other RF technologies
{"Image DocumentName": "Comparison of TriPollar\u00ae to other RF technologies", "Image ImageDescription": "Image. Clinical target. Power. Pain Level. Cooling. Visible Clinical Results. Mono Polar. Collagen fibers. High. ( W) Might be Very Painful. Always. After months. Uni Polar. (RF radiation) Very hot. Bi \u2013 Polar. Dermis & hypodermis. Medium. (10-200W) May be Painful. May be. After days / weeks. TriPollar\u00ae Focused energy on dermis & hypodermis. Low. (5 \u2013 50W) No Pain Pleasant. None. Immediate & long term. supported by clinical and histopathological studies.", "Image XResolution": "37", "Image YResolution": "37", "Image ResolutionUnit": "Pixels/Centimeter", "Image Software": "SlidePlayer", "Image YCbCrPositioning": "Centered"}