7. Evidence of Student Achievement
{"Image DocumentName": "7. Evidence of Student Achievement", "Image ImageDescription": "All Grades and Courses: The assessment can be scored by an equivalent peer. All Grades and Courses: The assessment is a commercially produced assessment that has a history of validity and reliability. Data Analysis and Interpretation. Guiding Questions: How can the assessment/performance task results be interpreted in the same way across equivalent peers? Is there a reliable and valid scoring and interpretive process (i.e., state developed, district-based, commercial, standardized, etc.) that is associated with the assessment/performance task? If so, please describe. Sample Statements: An equivalent peer can use the rubrics to assess the projects. Just as with task administration, some states and school districts are prohibiting the classroom teacher from scoring the assessments of the students that they teach. At present, Pennsylvania has no plan to do this, but individual school districts may. As with task administration, teachers might want to plan as if an equivalent peer\u2014a teacher who teaches the same grade or subject\u2014could score the assessment, regardless if the task and scoring system are teacher-developed or commercially produced.", "Image XResolution": "37", "Image YResolution": "37", "Image ResolutionUnit": "Pixels/Centimeter", "Image Software": "SlidePlayer", "Image YCbCrPositioning": "Centered"}